Per Skaane
Publications 2024
Digital breast tomosynthesis in mammographic screening: false negative cancer cases in the To-Be 1 trial
Insights Imaging, 15 (1), 38
DOI 10.1186/s13244-023-01604-5, PubMed 38332187
Publications 2023
Mammographic features and risk of breast cancer death among women with invasive screen-detected cancer in BreastScreen Norway 1996-2020
Eur Radiol, 34 (5), 3364-3374
DOI 10.1007/s00330-023-10369-w, PubMed 37935848
Interval and Successive-Round Cancers after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: We Still Need Convincing Results regarding Beneficial Evidence on Long-term Outcomes
Radiology, 307 (5), e230964
DOI 10.1148/radiol.230964, PubMed 37249434
Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading
Eur Radiol, 34 (6), 3912-3923
DOI 10.1007/s00330-023-10400-0, PubMed 37938385
Publications 2022
Contrast-enhanced mammography for screening recalls: a problem-solving assessment tool ready for use?
Eur Radiol, 32 (11), 7386-7387
DOI 10.1007/s00330-022-09094-7, PubMed 36100775
Publications 2021
Malignant Mammographic Asymmetric Densities without US Correlate Remain Challenging
Radiology, 302 (3), 533-534
DOI 10.1148/radiol.212628, PubMed 34874204
Publications 2020
[Bothersome breast implants]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 140 (3)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0015, PubMed 32105035
Complications of Breast Implants
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 140 (3), 213
Publications 2019
Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program
Eur Radiol, 29 (12), 6991-6999
DOI 10.1007/s00330-019-06264-y, PubMed 31187221
Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway
Radiology, 294 (2), 256-264
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019191337, PubMed 31821118
Consensus Meeting of Breast Imaging: BI-RADS® and Beyond
Breast Care (Basel), 14 (5), 308-314
DOI 10.1159/000503412, PubMed 31798391
How Can We Reduce Unnecessary Procedures after Screening Mammography?
Radiology, 291 (2), 318-319
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019190324, PubMed 30913018
Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
Radiology, 291 (1), 23-30
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019182394, PubMed 30777808
Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening
Radiology, 293 (1), 60-68
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019190425, PubMed 31407968
Publications 2018
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
Radiology, 287 (3), 787-794
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2018171361, PubMed 29494322
Screening-detected desmoid tumor of the breast: findings at conventional imaging and digital breast tomosynthesis
Acta Radiol Open, 7 (1), 2058460117752034
DOI 10.1177/2058460117752034, PubMed 29375894
Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 169 (3), 489-496
DOI 10.1007/s10549-018-4705-2, PubMed 29429017
Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality
Phys Med Biol, 63 (3), 035006
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa614, PubMed 29311416
Publications 2017
Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) in population breast cancer screening: a protocol for a collaborative individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
Transl. Cancer Res., 6 (4), 869-877
DOI 10.21037/tcr.2017.06.39
Response to: "Mammographic density as a risk factor: to go out of a 30-year fog"
Acta Radiol, 58 (6), NP2-NP3
DOI 10.1177/0284185117700753, PubMed 28361544
Publications 2016
Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials
Breast, 26, 119-34
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2016.01.007, PubMed 27017251
Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
Breast Cancer, 24 (1), 32-41
DOI 10.1007/s12282-016-0699-y, PubMed 27138386
Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation
Acta Radiol, 57 (10), 1178-85
DOI 10.1177/0284185115626469, PubMed 26792823
BI-RADS Density Classification From Areometric and Volumetric Automatic Breast Density Measurements
Acad Radiol, 23 (4), 468-78
DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.016, PubMed 26847741
Publications 2015
Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information
Eur Radiol, 25 (12), 3669-78
DOI 10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z, PubMed 26002130
Breast Elastography
Acta Radiol., 56 (11), NP46
DOI 10.1177/0284185115602481
Publications 2014
Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography
Radiology, 272 (1), 52-62
DOI 10.1148/radiol.14131502, PubMed 24689858
The cumulative risk of false-positive screening results across screening centres in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program
Eur J Radiol, 83 (9), 1639-44
DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.038, PubMed 24972452
Dose hysteria and concern about radiation exposure should not prevent women from undergoing life-saving mammography screening
Acta Radiol, 55 (10), 1155-6
DOI 10.1177/0284185114530547, PubMed 25398886
Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images
Radiology, 271 (3), 655-63
DOI 10.1148/radiol.13131391, PubMed 24484063
Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study
Acta Radiol, 56 (4), 404-12
DOI 10.1177/0284185114528835, PubMed 24682405
Publications 2013
Overdiagnosis among women attending a population-based mammography screening program
Int J Cancer, 133 (3), 705-12
DOI 10.1002/ijc.28052, PubMed 23355313
Response to comments by Kalager et al. and Zahl et al
Int J Cancer, 133 (11), 2756-7
DOI 10.1002/ijc.28247, PubMed 23650012
Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection
Breast, 22 (2), 101-108
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017, PubMed 23422255
Response
Radiology, 267 (3), 969
PubMed 23844424
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Better Mammogram Response
Radiology, 267 (3), 969
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
Eur Radiol, 23 (8), 2061-71
DOI 10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3, PubMed 23553585
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program
Radiology, 267 (1), 47-56
DOI 10.1148/radiol.12121373, PubMed 23297332
Publications 2012
Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer due to Mammography Screening
Ann Intern Med, 157 (3), 219; author reply 221-2
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00021, PubMed 22868848
Stage distribution of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of population-based mammographic screening
Rofo, 184 (5), 437-42
DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1299352, PubMed 22426937
Recall mammography and psychological distress
Eur J Cancer, 49 (4), 805-11
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.001, PubMed 23021930
Tomosynthesis in X-ray: proven additional value?
Eur J Radiol, 81 Suppl 1, S156-7
DOI 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70065-7, PubMed 23083572
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting
Acta Radiol, 53 (5), 524-9
DOI 10.1258/ar.2012.120062, PubMed 22593120
Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Acta Radiol, 53 (3), 241-8
DOI 10.1258/ar.2011.110452, PubMed 22287148
Publications 2011
Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortality
Lancet, 378 (9805), 1775-6
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61766-2, PubMed 22098846
Hormone therapy use and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 132 (1), 297-305
DOI 10.1007/s10549-011-1810-x, PubMed 22052325
Second events following ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a register-based cohort study
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 129 (3), 929-38
DOI 10.1007/s10549-011-1531-1, PubMed 21537936
MRI features of intraductal papilloma of the breast: sheep in wolf's clothing?
Acta Radiol, 52 (3), 264-72
DOI 10.1258/ar.2011.100434, PubMed 21498361
Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose
Eur J Radiol, 81 (7), 1483-7
DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.021, PubMed 21543174
Nationwide mammography screening registers: the best way to go for mortality evaluation - but there is no free lunch
Acta Radiol, 52 (3), 235
DOI 10.1258/ar.2010.100493, PubMed 21498355
Controversies in mammography screening: let us not ignore science in this never-ending debate
Acta Radiol, 52 (10), 1061-3
DOI 10.1258/ar.2011.11a010, PubMed 22144424
High-frequency breast ultrasound for the detection of microcalcifications and associated masses in BI-RADS 4a patients
Anticancer Res, 31 (8), 2575-81
PubMed 21778307
Publications 2010
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study
Acta Radiol, 51 (9), 962-8
DOI 10.3109/02841851.2010.504969, PubMed 20942729
Improved image quality of low-dose thoracic CT examinations with a new postprocessing software
J Appl Clin Med Phys, 11 (3), 3242
DOI 10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3242, PubMed 20717095
Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effect of a population-based screening programme
Breast, 19 (6), 499-505
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2010.05.014, PubMed 21071225
Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood cells for early detection of breast cancer
Breast Cancer Res, 12 (1), R7
DOI 10.1186/bcr2472, PubMed 20078854
Publications 2009
Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program
Radiology, 253 (3), 652-60
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2533090210, PubMed 19789229
Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast
Eur J Radiol, 76 (2), 195-210
DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.036, PubMed 19726148
Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery
Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 90 (5), 803-9
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.016, PubMed 19406300
Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review
Acta Radiol, 50 (1), 3-14
DOI 10.1080/02841850802563269, PubMed 19037825
Molecular imaging: a potential new tool for early detection and monitoring of targeted breast cancer therapy
Acta Radiol, 50 (10), 1092-3
DOI 10.3109/02841850903269188, PubMed 19922302
Publications 2008
Differential impact of conventional and low-dose oral hormone therapy, tibolone and raloxifene on mammographic breast density, assessed by an automated quantitative method
BJOG, 115 (6), 773-9
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01690.x, PubMed 18355366
Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers
Acta Radiol, 49 (9), 975-81
DOI 10.1080/02841850802403730, PubMed 18785026
Reduction in dose from CT examinations of liver lesions with a new postprocessing filter: a ROC phantom study
Acta Radiol, 49 (3), 303-9
DOI 10.1080/02841850701793769, PubMed 18365819
Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
Eur Radiol, 18 (6), 1134-43
DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-0878-0, PubMed 18301902
Publications 2007
Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series
Breast, 16 (4), 367-74
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.006, PubMed 17317184
Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program
Eur J Epidemiol, 22 (7), 447-55
DOI 10.1007/s10654-007-9137-y, PubMed 17594526
Evaluation of population-based mammmographic "service" screening: a case-control study of the Icelandic breast cancer screening program
Acta Radiol, 48 (9), 941-2
DOI 10.1080/02841850701652908, PubMed 17957506
Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study
Radiology, 244 (3), 708-17
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2443061478, PubMed 17709826
Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188 (2), 377-84
DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.2207, PubMed 17242245
Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study
Eur Radiol, 18 (1), 183-91
DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0730-y, PubMed 17680246
Publications 2006
Number and characteristics of breast cancer cases diagnosed in four periods in the screening interval of a biennial population-based screening programme
J Med Screen, 13 (4), 192-6
DOI 10.1177/096914130601300406, PubMed 17217608
Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a proper measurement for performance in breast cancer screening?
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186 (2), 579-80; author reply 580
DOI 10.2214/AJR.06.5007, PubMed 16423973
Publications 2005
Migration of the breast biopsy localization wire to the pulmonary hilus
Acta Radiol, 46 (1), 28-31
DOI 10.1080/02841850510015956, PubMed 15841736
Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program
Radiology, 237 (2), 437-43
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2372041174, PubMed 16244251
Early detection of breast cancer based on gene-expression patterns in peripheral blood cells
Breast Cancer Res, 7 (5), R634-44
DOI 10.1186/bcr1203, PubMed 16168108
Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study
Radiology, 237 (1), 37-44
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2371041605, PubMed 16100086
Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
Acta Radiol, 46 (7), 679-89
DOI 10.1080/02841850500223547, PubMed 16372686
Publications 2004
To believe or not to believe: looking into the unbelievable
Acta Radiol, 45 (3), 247
DOI 10.1080/02841850410005895, PubMed 15239416
CAD--the future blessing for radiology?
Acta Radiol, 45 (7), 701
PubMed 15624509
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study
Radiology, 232 (1), 197-204
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2321031624, PubMed 15155893
Publications 2003
Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography
J Digit Imaging, 16 (4), 341-4
DOI 10.1007/s10278-003-1661-z, PubMed 14749966
Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001
Breast, 12 (5), 314-9
DOI 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00102-4, PubMed 14659146
Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study
Radiology, 229 (3), 877-84
DOI 10.1148/radiol.2293021171, PubMed 14576447
Publications 2002
Logistics of referral, diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with breast symptoms and signs
Scand J Surg, 91 (3), 232-8
DOI 10.1177/145749690209100304, PubMed 12449464
[What place does ultrasonography have in inflammatory bowel disease?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 122 (27), 2593
PubMed 12523184
Publications 2001
Population-based full field direct digital mammography (FFDDM) screening: The Oslo project
IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 530-536
Interval cancers in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program: frequency, characteristics and use of HRT
Int J Cancer, 94 (4), 594-8
DOI 10.1002/ijc.1511, PubMed 11745450
Publications 2000
[Diagnostic and therapeutic localized breast biopsy]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (5), 595-7
PubMed 10833920
Population-based full field direct digital mammography (FFDDM) screening: The Oslo project
INT CONGR SER, 1214, 543-546
[Modern technology in the diagnosis of breast diseases--magnetic resonance tomography]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (12), 1399
PubMed 10851931
Publications 1999
[A prospective registration of diagnosis and treatment of breast tumors at the Ulleval hospital 1988-1995]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 119 (24), 3562-6
PubMed 10563172
The additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. A prospective study
Acta Radiol, 40 (5), 486-90
DOI 10.3109/02841859909175572, PubMed 10485236
Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors
Acta Radiol Suppl, 420, 1-47
PubMed 10693544
Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors
Acta Radiol., 40 420, 7-+
Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors
[P. Skaane], Oslo, 1 b. (flere pag.)
BIBSYS 991423542, ISBN 82-995170-0-1
Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors
Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 47 s.
BIBSYS 991449622, ISBN 87-16-16366-4
Variability in the interpretation of ultrasonography in patients with palpable noncalcified breast tumors
Acta Radiol, 40 (2), 169-75
DOI 10.3109/02841859909177733, PubMed 10080729
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with palpable mammographically noncalcified breast tumors
Acta Radiol, 40 (2), 163-8
DOI 10.3109/02841859909177732, PubMed 10080728
Ultrasonography of malignant breast neoplasms. Analysis of carcinomas missed as tumor
Acta Radiol, 40 (4), 376-82
DOI 10.3109/02841859909177750, PubMed 10394864
Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma
Acta Radiol, 40 (4), 369-75
DOI 10.3109/02841859909177749, PubMed 10394863
Publications 1998
[Magnetic tomography of the breast]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 118 (16), 2486-90
PubMed 9667126
Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170 (1), 109-14
DOI 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423610, PubMed 9423610
More on sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma - Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., 171 (4), 1160
Publications 1997
Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses
Acta Radiol, 38 (4 Pt 1), 497-502
DOI 10.1080/02841859709174375, PubMed 9240666
Routine ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a valuable tool in daily practice?
Am Surg, 63 (11), 937-42
PubMed 9358775
Publications 1995
[Investigation of palpable breast tumours. Patient flow and quality assessment of the tripple diagnostic procedure]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 115 (16), 1965-9
PubMed 7638852
Publications 1993
[Microductectomy. A simple method for excision of intraductal changes in the breast]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 113 (10), 1233-5
PubMed 8493656
An extraperitoneal ischiorectogluteal lipoma treated by liposuction. Case report
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 27 (4), 323-5
DOI 10.1080/02844311.1993.12005649, PubMed 8159949
A personal-computer semiautomated report-coding system for diagnostic mammography
Eur J Radiol, 17 (1), 43-6
DOI 10.1016/0720-048x(93)90027-k, PubMed 8348912
[Adenocarcinoid (mucinous carcinoid) of the vermiform appendix]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 113 (18), 2259-60
PubMed 8362393
Publications 1992
[Ultrasonic examination of the breast]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 112 (18), 2367-9
PubMed 1412239
Value of computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of resectability and staging in oesophageal carcinoma
Eur J Surg, 158 (10), 537-40
PubMed 1360825
[Intraoperative ultrasonography of the liver]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 112 (16), 2065-9
PubMed 1523624
Publications 1991
Nuclear morphometry of benign and malignant breast lesions
Eur J Surg Oncol, 17 (4), 350-3
PubMed 1874292
[Breast tumor and negative mammography]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 111 (7), 817-8
PubMed 2020946
Publications 1990
The histopathology of non-palpable breast lesions detected by clinical mammography
Eur J Surg Oncol, 16 (6), 475-80
PubMed 2253791
Nonspecific inflammatory pseudotumour of the caecum unrelated to the vermiform appendix
Ital J Gastroenterol, 22 (6), 357-9
PubMed 2131956
Primary adenocarcinoma of the vermiform appendix: ultrasound and CT demonstration
Rofo, 152 (5), 613-4
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1046935, PubMed 2160703
Ultrasonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective study
Br J Radiol, 63 (754), 787-93
DOI 10.1259/0007-1285-63-754-787, PubMed 2242476
Ultrasound and CT evaluation of pedunculated gastrointestinal lipomas
Radiologe, 30 (1), 12-4
PubMed 2183271
Peridiverticulitis of the appendix: an unusual ultrasonic "target lesion"
J Clin Gastroenterol, 12 (3), 353-6
DOI 10.1097/00004836-199006000-00028, PubMed 2193986
Publications 1989
Ultrasonography and parameters of inflammation in acute appendicitis. A comparison with clinical findings
Acta Chir Scand, 155 (3), 185-9
PubMed 2662692
Out-patient surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions. Technique, results and consequences
Acta Chir Scand, 155 (6-7), 313-6
PubMed 2816214
[Acute intestinal bleeding in benign solitary cecal ulcer]
Rofo, 150 (1), 96-7
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1046982, PubMed 2536506
Ultrasonic features of ileocecal intussusception
J Clin Ultrasound, 17 (8), 590-3
DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870170809, PubMed 2507585
Sonographic and CT appearance of exogastric leiomyoma
Radiologe, 29 (8), 394-5
PubMed 2678238
Publications 1988
Hypoechoic solitary inflammatory polyp of the gallbladder
J Clin Ultrasound, 16 (8), 603-4
DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870160815, PubMed 3152410
[Examination and treatment of breast cancer. Where are we today?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 108 (25), 2020-2
PubMed 3201411
Radiological features of mucocele of the appendix
Rofo, 149 (6), 624-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1048418, PubMed 2849161
[False positive mammography in edema of the breast]
Ugeskr Laeger, 150 (11), 688
PubMed 3354102
[Diagnostic imaging of acute appendicitis]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 108 (4), 313-4, 321
PubMed 3281321
[Benign neoplastic mucocele of the appendix: mucinous cystadenocarcinoma]
Zentralbl Chir, 113 (22), 1488-92
PubMed 3213301
Ultrasonographic features of mucocele of the appendix
J Clin Ultrasound, 16 (8), 584-7
DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870160810, PubMed 3152405
Publications 1987
Ultrasonic demonstration of a pedunculated colonic polyp
J Clin Ultrasound, 15 (3), 204-6
DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870150311, PubMed 3134418
[Ultrasonic diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 107 (19-21), 1674-5
PubMed 3307019
The ultrasonic demonstration of carcinoid tumor of the ileocecal valve
Am J Gastroenterol, 82 (2), 168-70
PubMed 3544813
Unilateral breast hyperplasia in pregnancy simulating neoplasm
Br J Radiol, 60 (712), 407-9
DOI 10.1259/0007-1285-60-712-407, PubMed 3555677
Publications 1986
The "empty" right iliac fossa. Radiological features of a large retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Rofo, 145 (3), 350-1
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1048949, PubMed 3020645
[Primary tumors of the appendix]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 106 (16), 1401-4
PubMed 3750295
[Fat-fluid level in a dermoid cyst]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 106 (27), 2243-4
PubMed 3787579
Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix presenting as an ovarian cystadenocarcinoma: case report and review of appendiceal neoplasms with ovarian metastases
Eur J Surg Oncol, 12 (4), 379-84
PubMed 3023143
Publications 1985
[Circumscribed and diffuse skin thickening (peau d'orange) of the female breast]
Rofo, 143 (2), 212-9
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1052792, PubMed 2992039
Computed tomography of mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the appendix presenting as a bladder tumor
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 9 (3), 566-7
DOI 10.1097/00004728-198505000-00031, PubMed 2985665
Computed tomography of adult ileocolic intussusception
Gastrointest Radiol, 10 (4), 355-7
DOI 10.1007/BF01893131, PubMed 4054504
Massive haemorrhage from a caecal diverticulum
Rofo, 143 (3), 369-70
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1052829, PubMed 2996084
Publications 1984
[Radiological study of the liver and its diseases by plain x-ray film and angiography]
Z Gastroenterol, 22 (4), 165-75
PubMed 6375178
Publications 1983
[Radiologic differential diagnosis of cecal tumors with special reference to polypoid filling defects in colonic contrast enema]
Rofo, 138 (3), 265-75
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1055724, PubMed 6403419
Computed tomography of cystic ovarian teratomas with gravity-dependent layering
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 7 (5), 837-41
DOI 10.1097/00004728-198310000-00016, PubMed 6886137
[Circumscribed intra-areolar skin edema in cranially localized breast cancer]
Rofo, 138 (2), 250-2
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1055722, PubMed 6298085
Publications 1982
[Obstruction of the 3 large unpaired intestinal arteries without clinical symptoms (asymptomatic "triple obstruction")]
Rofo, 136 (2), 217-9
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056034, PubMed 6212442
[So-called fetal form of the vermiform appendix]
Rofo, 137 (6), 729-31
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056288, PubMed 6218056
Publications 1981
[Fibroadenolipoma (hamartoma) of the breast]
Rofo, 135 (6), 747-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056514, PubMed 6212400
Spontaneous appendicocutaneous fistula: report of a case and review of the literature
Dis Colon Rectum, 24 (7), 550-4
DOI 10.1007/BF02604323, PubMed 7028428
Lipomatosis and true lipomas of the ileocecal valve
Rofo, 135 (6), 663-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056492, PubMed 6212382
Spontaneous rupture of a massive physopyometra presenting as an acute abdominal emergency
Rofo, 134 (6), 697-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056448, PubMed 6454636
["Crowned" odontoid process and osteoarthrosis of the anterior atlantoaxial joint (author's transl)]
Rofo, 134 (1), 62-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056302, PubMed 6452336
Fat--fluid level in in a cystic ovarian teratoma
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 5 (4), 577-9
DOI 10.1097/00004728-198108000-00024, PubMed 7264001
Publications 1980
Benign lymphoid polyp (localized lymphoid hyperplasia) at the tip of the cecum associated with lymphoid hyperplasia of the appendix
Hepatogastroenterology, 27 (4), 327-9
PubMed 7203367
[Blood pressure observation during renal cyst decompression--case report on a benign solitary renal cyst as a cause of hypertension]
Z Urol Nephrol, 73 (7), 517-22
PubMed 7415592
Extra-abdominal desmoid tumor of the axilla
Rofo, 132 (3), 349-51
DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1056578, PubMed 6448796
Publications 1977
[Epi-(peri-, extra-)membranous glomerulonephritis]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 97 (33), 1740-3
PubMed 594973
[Asymptomatic primary appendiceal carcinoma with lymph node metastases]
Zentralbl Chir, 102 (9), 564-8
PubMed 883444
Malignant appendiceal carcinoid with intussusception of the base manifesting as a cecal tumor: report of a case
Dis Colon Rectum, 20 (6), 511-4
DOI 10.1007/BF02586591, PubMed 902547
Publications 1975
[Proceedings: Size of juxtaglomerular cell complexes in various forms of glomerulonephritis with the facultative nephrotic syndrome]
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol, 59, 538
PubMed 1217115
Morphometric studies of the juxtaglomerular apparatus in perimembranous glomerulonephritis
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A, 83 (3), 301-8
DOI 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1975.tb01877.x, PubMed 1155098
Publications 1974
[Proceedings: Correlation between morphology and clinical aspects in peri-membranous glomerulonephrititis. An analysis of 404 biopsies]
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol, 58, 480
PubMed 4460508
Publications 1973
[Proceedings: Quantitative morphology of the juxtaglomerular apparatus in perimembrane glomerulonephritis]
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol, 57, 457
PubMed 4142297