Mette Kalager
- Researcher; MD, PhD
Publications 2024
Fitting a progressive three-state colorectal cancer model to interval-censored surveillance data under outcome-dependent sampling using a weighted likelihood approach
Am J Epidemiol (in press)
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwae307, PubMed 39214647
Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening-Reply
JAMA Intern Med, 184 (2), 228
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7067, PubMed 38165695
[Scraps of national clinical guidelines from the Directorate of Health]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (5)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0141, PubMed 38651715
Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer
JAMA Netw Open, 7 (2), e240007
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007, PubMed 38421651
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (13)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0539, PubMed 39498648
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0374, PubMed 39404259
Surgical treatment of benign colorectal polyps 2008-21
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (10)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0722, PubMed 39254026
Adenoma Detection Rates by Physicians and Subsequent Colorectal Cancer Risk
JAMA (in press)
DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.22975, PubMed 39680377
Publications 2023
The Future of Cancer Screening-Guided Without Conflicts of Interest
JAMA Intern Med, 183 (10), 1047-1048
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4064, PubMed 37639267
What is my risk, doctor? How to convey disease risk and treatment effects
BMJ, 381, e075289
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-075289, PubMed 37328165
Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
JAMA Intern Med, 183 (11), 1196-1203
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798, PubMed 37639247
Risk Prediction of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer from Molecular Features of Adenomas: A Nested Case-Control Study
Cancer Res Commun, 3 (11), 2292-2301
DOI 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0186, PubMed 37921412
A Comparison of Risk Classification Systems of Colorectal Adenomas: A Case-Cohort Study
Gastroenterology, 165 (2), 483-491.e7
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.028, PubMed 37146913
[Do the Directorate of Health’s guidelines adhere to international standards for trustworthy clinical practice?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (14)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0110, PubMed 37830968
Measuring broad-spectrum antibiotic use in hospitals with established versus new indicators
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (6)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0427, PubMed 37097231
[Correction: Measuring broad-spectrum antibiotic use in hospitals with established versus new indicators]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (7)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0301, PubMed 37158510
A pilot study of implementation of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in Norway
Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (10), 1180-1184
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204389, PubMed 37128713
Risk of malignant lymphomas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study
BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 10 (1)
DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001037, PubMed 37142293
Publications 2022
Impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal polyp detection for early-career endoscopists: an international comparative study
Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (10), 1272-1277
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2070436, PubMed 35605150
A progressive three-state model to estimate time to cancer: a likelihood-based approach
BMC Med Res Methodol, 22 (1), 179
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2, PubMed 35761181
Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the adult population during the pre-vaccination period, Norway, winter 2020/21
Euro Surveill, 27 (13)
DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.13.2100376, PubMed 35362405
Speedometer for withdrawal time monitoring during colonoscopy: a clinical implementation trial
Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (6), 664-670
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2154616, PubMed 36519564
Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Optical Diagnosis of Neoplastic Polyps during Colonoscopy
NEJM Evid, 1 (6), EVIDoa2200003
DOI 10.1056/EVIDoa2200003, PubMed 38319238
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
N Engl J Med, 387 (17), 1547-1556
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375, PubMed 36214590
Colorectal Cancer Screening - Approach, Evidence, and Future Directions
NEJM Evid, 1 (1), EVIDra2100035
DOI 10.1056/EVIDra2100035, PubMed 38319175
Reply to: Letter to the Editor regarding "Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway-a randomized trial"
BMC Public Health, 22 (1), 2437
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14799-x, PubMed 36575428
Letter: long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal associated with heritable factors, colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin-authors' reply
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (10), 1363-1364
DOI 10.1111/apt.16929, PubMed 35472187
Emergency hospital admissions, prognosis, and population mortality in Norway during the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic
Scand J Public Health, 50 (6), 795-802
DOI 10.1177/14034948221082959, PubMed 35546560
15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Ann Intern Med, 175 (11), 1525-1533
DOI 10.7326/M22-0835, PubMed 36215714
Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: results from the EPoS trials
Gut, 72 (5), 951-957
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327696, PubMed 36307178
Cancer outcome research - a European challenge Part II: Opportunities and priorities
Mol Oncol, 16 (12), 2300-2311
DOI 10.1002/1878-0261.13169, PubMed 34939327
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polyp Removal: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21 (4), 949-959.e2
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.022, PubMed 36038128
Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 54 (10), 961-969
DOI 10.1055/a-1734-7952, PubMed 35008112
Impact of time between faecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening on screening results: A natural experiment
Int J Cancer, 152 (7), 1414-1424
DOI 10.1002/ijc.34351, PubMed 36346118
Risk of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer is increased by primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study
United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (2), 212-224
DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12204, PubMed 35107865
Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors in the small bowel
Ann Oncol, 33 (6), 649-656
DOI 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.226, PubMed 35276334
Publications 2021
Evidence and Precaution for Legal Health Interventions: Learning From the COVID-19 Pandemic
Ann Intern Med, 174 (10), 1456-1457
DOI 10.7326/M21-2839, PubMed 34370512
Deep learning and cancer biomarkers: recognising lead-time bias
Lancet, 397 (10270), 194
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32402-8, PubMed 33453776
Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway - a randomized trial
BMC Public Health, 21 (1), 2103
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12073-0, PubMed 34789188
Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal in women and men
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (4), 412-421
DOI 10.1111/apt.16686, PubMed 34716941
Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic
Scand J Public Health, 50 (1), 38-45
DOI 10.1177/14034948211047137, PubMed 34609261
Cancer outcomes research-a European challenge: measures of the cancer burden
Mol Oncol, 15 (12), 3225-3241
DOI 10.1002/1878-0261.13012, PubMed 34003576
Hopes and Hypes for Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Gastroenterology, 161 (3), 774-777
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.078, PubMed 33989659
A novel intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. A two-center pilot trial
Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (2), 232-238
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2021.1994641, PubMed 34714203
Estimation of overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing: comparison of simulation models
BMJ Open, 11 (4), e042158
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042158, PubMed 33853794
Publications 2020
Assessment of cancer screening effectiveness in the era of screening programs
Eur J Epidemiol, 35 (10), 891-897
DOI 10.1007/s10654-020-00684-7, PubMed 32929645
Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy, 53 (3), 277-284
DOI 10.1055/a-1201-7165, PubMed 32557490
Towards a cancer mission in Horizon Europe: recommendations
Mol Oncol, 14 (8), 1589-1615
DOI 10.1002/1878-0261.12763, PubMed 32749074
The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?
CMAJ, 192 (18), E484
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.74839, PubMed 32366471
Disparities in Preventive Health Services: Targeting Minorities and Majorities
Ann Intern Med, 172 (4), 287-288
DOI 10.7326/M19-3899, PubMed 31931529
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Young Adults: About Carcinoid Tumors and Cancer
Ann Intern Med, 174 (2), 263-264
DOI 10.7326/M20-7244, PubMed 33315472
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020
Endoscopy, 52 (8), 687-700
DOI 10.1055/a-1185-3109, PubMed 32572858
The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden - threats, trust, and impact on daily life: a comparative survey
BMC Public Health, 20 (1), 1597
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3, PubMed 33097011
Ongoing Trials Will Not Determine the Comparative Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
Gastroenterology, 164 (6), 856-860
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.071, PubMed 32585308
Improving cancer screening programs
Science, 367 (6474), 143-144
DOI 10.1126/science.aay3156, PubMed 31919207
Negative controls to detect uncontrolled confounding in observational studies of mammographic screening comparing participants and non-participants
Int J Epidemiol, 49 (3), 1032-1042
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyaa029, PubMed 32211885
Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study
Endoscopy, 53 (4), 383-391
DOI 10.1055/a-1243-0379, PubMed 32961579
Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies
Gastroenterology, 160 (4), 1067-1074.e6
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009, PubMed 33065063
Publications 2019
Time to abandon early detection cancer screening
Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (3), e13062
DOI 10.1111/eci.13062, PubMed 30565674
Author Reply to: The name of the game: Is preventive screening "cancer screening?"
Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (6), e13097
DOI 10.1111/eci.13097, PubMed 30829396
Implications of different guidelines for surveillance after serrated polyp resection in United States of America and Europe
Endoscopy, 51 (8), 750-758
DOI 10.1055/a-0916-8598, PubMed 31195423
From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
Ann Intern Med, 170 (10), 734
DOI 10.7326/L19-0086, PubMed 31108525
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline
BMJ, 367, l5515
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5515, PubMed 31578196
[Colorectal cancer screening, yes or no?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (15)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0323, PubMed 31642636
Colorectal cancer screening, right?
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (15), 1450-1451
Revisiting surveillance schemes for cancer survivors
Ann Oncol, 30 (6), 881-883
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz107, PubMed 30895293
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Cancer survivors: surveillance or not surveillance?' by Santeufemia and Miolo
Ann Oncol, 30 (9), 1531-1532
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz190, PubMed 31198953
[StatMed – the new oil?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (9)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0349, PubMed 31140239
[M. Kalager responds]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (11)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0440, PubMed 31429242
StatMed- the new oil?
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (9), 783
StatMed - well intended but unknowable Reply
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (11), 1017
Privacy - an obstacle course
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (4), 314-315
[Data protection – an obstacle course]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (4)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0077, PubMed 30808102
Lack of association between screening interval and cancer stage in Lynch syndrome may be accounted for by over-diagnosis; a prospective Lynch syndrome database report
Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 17, 8
DOI 10.1186/s13053-019-0106-8, PubMed 30858900
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies
Gastroenterology, 158 (4), 875-883.e5
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011, PubMed 31563625
Reply to: Loss of QALY in mammography screening reported by Zahl et al
Int J Cancer, 146 (4), 1177
DOI 10.1002/ijc.32755, PubMed 31652342
Quality-of-life effects of screening mammography in Norway
Int J Cancer, 146 (8), 2104-2112
DOI 10.1002/ijc.32539, PubMed 31254388
Publications 2018
Uterine morcellation and survival in uterine sarcomas
Eur J Cancer, 101, 62-68
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.007, PubMed 30025231
When no guideline recommendation is the best recommendation
Lancet, 392 (10151), 898-899
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31671-4, PubMed 30238877
From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
Ann Intern Med, 169 (6), 405-406
DOI 10.7326/M18-1720, PubMed 29987330
Examining Bias in Studies of Statin Treatment and Survival in Patients With Cancer
JAMA Oncol, 4 (1), 63-70
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2752, PubMed 28822996
Why a randomized melanoma screening trial is not a good idea
Br J Dermatol, 179 (2), 532-533
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16784, PubMed 29893490
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, 168 (11), 775-782
DOI 10.7326/M17-1441, PubMed 29710125
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Women and Men
Ann Intern Med, 169 (9), 663-664
DOI 10.7326/L18-0512, PubMed 30398636
Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial
Gastroenterology, 155 (6), 1787-1794.e3
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.035, PubMed 30165051
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection
N Engl J Med, 378 (26), 2535-2536
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1803103, PubMed 29860912
[Health without knowledge?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 138 (5)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.1058, PubMed 29513441
Health without knowledge?
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 138 (5), 432-433
Overdiagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Acknowledge a Blind Spot
Gastroenterology, 155 (3), 592-595
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.037, PubMed 30076834
The Screening Illustrator: separating the effects of lead-time and overdiagnosis in mammography screening
Eur J Public Health, 28 (6), 1138-1142
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/cky085, PubMed 29796623
Tailoring the message with selective reporting
Eur J Epidemiol, 33 (8), 773
DOI 10.1007/s10654-018-0416-6, PubMed 29846866
Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey
Endosc Int Open, 6 (7), E812-E820
DOI 10.1055/a-0607-0727, PubMed 29977999
Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening
Gastroenterology, 155 (4), 1059-1068.e2
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.040, PubMed 29935150
Publications 2017
Colorectal cancer death after adenoma removal in Scandinavia
Scand J Gastroenterol, 52 (12), 1377-1384
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2017.1377763, PubMed 28906163
Authors' reply to Doherty and Hawkins
BMJ, 356, j1267
DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1267, PubMed 28283482
Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials
BMJ, 356, i6673
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i6673, PubMed 28087510
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark: A Cohort Study of Tumor Size and Overdiagnosis
Ann Intern Med, 166 (5), 313-323
DOI 10.7326/M16-0270, PubMed 28114661
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark
Ann Intern Med, 167 (7), 524
DOI 10.7326/L17-0270, PubMed 28973200
[Share data]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (10), 679
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0446, PubMed 28551946
Breast cancer screening
BMJ, 359, j5625
DOI 10.1136/bmj.j5625, PubMed 29212770
[Screening for the individual and knowledge for all]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (12-13), 858
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0445, PubMed 28655269
Colorectal adenomas, surveillance, and cancer
Lancet Oncol, 18 (8), e427
DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30473-4, PubMed 28759374
[More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (3), 175-176
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0954, PubMed 28181749
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (9), 599
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0296, PubMed 28468459
More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know? Reply
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (9), 599
Publications 2016
The continuing uncertainty about cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, 65 (6), 889-93
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311003, PubMed 27008845
Are rapidly growing cancers more lethal?
Eur J Cancer, 72, 210-214
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.011, PubMed 28042992
Lifestyle changes at middle age and mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study
J Epidemiol Community Health, 71 (1), 59-66
DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-206760, PubMed 27312250
Who Is for CO2? Slow Adoption of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy
Ann Intern Med, 165 (2), 145-6
DOI 10.7326/M16-0209, PubMed 27159139
America, We Are Confused: The Updated U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Colorectal Cancer Screening
Ann Intern Med, 166 (2), 139-140
DOI 10.7326/M16-1805, PubMed 27820949
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA Intern Med, 176 (7), 894-902
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960, PubMed 27214731
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 45 (2), 193-204
DOI 10.1111/apt.13857, PubMed 27859394
Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial
United European Gastroenterol J, 5 (1), 128-133
DOI 10.1177/2050640616639162, PubMed 28405331
Incentives and participation in a medical survey
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (12-13), 1082-7
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1096, PubMed 27381786
Routine vs. on-demand analgesia in colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
Endoscopy, 48 (9), 823-8
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-108433, PubMed 27305424
Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Observational Data: Active Comparators to Emulate Target Trials with Inactive Comparators
EGEMS (Wash DC), 4 (1), 1234
DOI 10.13063/2327-9214.1234, PubMed 27891526
Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials
Endoscopy, 48 (6), 571-8
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-104116, PubMed 27042931
Overview of guidelines on breast screening: Why recommendations differ and what to do about it
Breast, 31, 261-269
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.002, PubMed 27717717
Recognizing Data Generation
N Engl J Med, 374 (19), 1898
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1603789, PubMed 27096437
Aspirin, Colorectal Cancer, and Cause of Death: A Complex Landscape
J Clin Oncol, 35 (5), 568-569
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3751, PubMed 29236619
Commentary: "Randomize, Then Consent" or "Consent, Then Randomize"?: Revitalizing the Issue of Preconsent Randomization
Epidemiology, 27 (3), 393-4
DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000469, PubMed 26849639
Publications 2015
Do's and don'ts in evaluation of endoscopic screening for gastrointestinal cancers
Endoscopy, 48 (1), 75-80
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1393094, PubMed 26382306
Methods to Estimate the Comparative Effectiveness of Clinical Strategies that Administer the Same Intervention at Different Times
Curr Epidemiol Rep, 2 (3), 149-161
DOI 10.1007/s40471-015-0045-5, PubMed 26587368
Benefits and harms of mammography screening
Breast Cancer Res, 17 (1), 63
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z, PubMed 25928287
Bounding the per-protocol effect in randomized trials: an application to colorectal cancer screening
Trials, 16, 541
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1056-8, PubMed 26620120
Publications 2014
Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
Gut, 64 (8), 1268-76
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307376, PubMed 25183203
Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal REPLY
N. Engl. J. Med., 371 (21), 2035-2036
Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
N Engl J Med, 371 (21), 2036-7
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1411954, PubMed 25409378
Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 47 (3), 192-9
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390795, PubMed 25412093
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the incidence of advanced neoplasia after polypectomy in patients with and without low-risk adenomas
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 39 (9), 905-12
DOI 10.1111/apt.12682, PubMed 24593121
Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps
Gut, 64 (6), 929-36
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307793, PubMed 25399542
Colorectal cancer and the effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening--reply
JAMA, 312 (22), 2411-2
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.14695, PubMed 25490338
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA, 312 (6), 606-15
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.8266, PubMed 25117129
Too much mammography
BMJ, 348, g1403
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g1403, PubMed 24519765
Comparative analysis of breast cancer mortality following mammography screening in Denmark and Norway
Ann Oncol, 25 (6), 1137-43
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdu122, PubMed 24669012
Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
N Engl J Med, 371 (9), 799-807
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1315870, PubMed 25162886
Publications 2013
Principles, effectiveness and caveats in screening for cancer
Br J Surg, 100 (1), 55-65
DOI 10.1002/bjs.8995, PubMed 23212620
Current status of screening for colorectal cancer
Ann Oncol, 24 (8), 1963-72
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdt157, PubMed 23619033
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
Endoscopy, 45 (10), 842-51
DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1344548, PubMed 24030244
Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: women have minimal prior awareness of the issue, and their screening intentions are influenced by the size of the risk
Evid Based Nurs, 17 (1), 7-8
DOI 10.1136/eb-2013-101281, PubMed 24001593
Failure to account for selection-bias
Int J Cancer, 133 (11), 2751-3
DOI 10.1002/ijc.28244, PubMed 23649899
Long-term effectiveness of endoscopic screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial
United European Gastroenterol J, 1 (3), 162-8
DOI 10.1177/2050640613483290, PubMed 24917955
Publications 2012
Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia--letter
Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 5 (12), 1405; author reply 1406
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0383, PubMed 23151804
Colonoscopy as a triage screening test
N Engl J Med, 366 (8), 759-60
DOI 10.1056/NEJMe1114639, PubMed 22356330
Colorectal-Cancer Screening Reply
N. Engl. J. Med., 366 (22), 2131
Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 44 (8), 740-6
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1309755, PubMed 22622786
Comparing attendees with non-attendees in breast screening does not provide useful information about an effect on prognostic features or mortality
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 136 (2), 617-8, author reply 619-20
DOI 10.1007/s10549-012-2250-y, PubMed 23011508
[First, do no harm]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 132 (4), 383
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0079, PubMed 22353816
Letter to the Editor: Hofvind S, Skaane P. Stage distribution of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of population-based mammographic screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2012; 184: 437-442
Rofo, 184 (8), 746; author reply 746-7
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1313010, PubMed 22851265
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program
Ann Intern Med, 156 (7), 491-9
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005, PubMed 22473436
Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer due to Mammography Screening RESPONSE
Ann. Intern. Med., 157 (3), 221-222
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00025
Limited use of nonprogram screening in Norway
Int J Cancer, 132 (7), 1723-4
DOI 10.1002/ijc.27807, PubMed 22933134
Prognosis in women with interval breast cancer: population based observational cohort study
BMJ, 345, e7536
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e7536, PubMed 23160783
Clinical decisions. Mammography screening for breast cancer
N Engl J Med, 367 (21), e31
DOI 10.1056/NEJMclde1212888, PubMed 23171121
Publications 2011
Regression of screening-detected breast cancer
Lancet Oncol, 12 (12), 1083-4
DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70262-5, PubMed 21996167
Publications 2010
Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway
N Engl J Med, 363 (13), 1203-10
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727, PubMed 20860502
Publications 2009
Spontaneous regression of invasive breast cancer: does this study answer the question?
Arch Intern Med, 169 (10), 997
DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.91, PubMed 19468097
Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study
Breast Cancer Res, 11 (4), R44
DOI 10.1186/bcr2331, PubMed 19575807
[Survival after breast cancer--differences between Norwegian counties]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (24), 2595-600
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.0024, PubMed 20029554
Publications 2008
[Unclear about overdiagnosis of breast cancer]
Ugeskr Laeger, 170 (33), 2473; author reply 2473
PubMed 18763381
Publications 2000
[Practice from Germany not sanctioned as specialist education in Norway]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (21), 2580-1
PubMed 11071005